Active Entries
- 1: [Open Post] Heathen Open Post
- 2: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on A Short History of Ethics
- 3: Ask Me (Just About) Anything
- 4: A Request: Help with Dream Interpretation
- 5: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Blessing: the Art and the Practice
- 6: Divination Offering - Rune or Ogham Reading Through the End of the Year
- 7: [Main Blog Post] Looking Back on 2024 and Forward to 2025
- 8: [Main Blog Post] How the Cost of Freight Has Shaped the World
- 9: [Main Blog Post] [Heathen Rosary] Draft "Hail Holy Forebears"
- 10: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on Shadow Tech
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2023-06-12 04:44 pm (UTC)I encountered a similar issue recently as I was reading through a book on Hellenic reconstructionism. The author frequently used the passive voice to (seemingly) stealth his own off-topic opinions into the text; as if his opinions are some sort of vague consensus, rather than just his own opinions. Ofc, this gimmick might seem pretty obvious to anyone who has a basic understanding of English grammar and syntax and is paying attention to what they are reading.
Regarding the dodgy source-attribution you mention, I've seen this a lot when an author is trying to pass off their work as being academic. Throwing in tons of citations does sort of present a veneer of scholarly rigour. Of course, it's easy to see for yourself if the citations actually confirm what the author is trying to claim. I'm guessing a small percentage of readers actually investigate a book's bibliography. Thus, an unscrupulous (or just sloppy) author can make all sort of spurious statements and generally get away with doing such.