Active Entries
- 1: [Open Post] Heathen Open Post
- 2: A Request: Help with Dream Interpretation
- 3: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on A Short History of Ethics
- 4: Ask Me (Just About) Anything
- 5: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Blessing: the Art and the Practice
- 6: Divination Offering - Rune or Ogham Reading Through the End of the Year
- 7: [Main Blog Post] Looking Back on 2024 and Forward to 2025
- 8: [Main Blog Post] How the Cost of Freight Has Shaped the World
- 9: [Main Blog Post] [Heathen Rosary] Draft "Hail Holy Forebears"
- 10: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on Shadow Tech
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2023-05-30 02:54 am (UTC)On your first point, I'd say that those are examples of engineering, not fundamental physics. Physics has been trying to make String Theory yield the kind of insights relativity and the quantum revolution did since the 70s, and from what I've heard, it has not been working. And folks like Peter Thiel say that outside of computers, we haven't been advancing much on engineering either.
That aside, as for "collapsing," I should reiterate that Spengler didn't characterize the transition from Culture to Civilization as "collapse" - he pinned the Apollonian transition from Culture to Civilization as happening between Alexander and Augustus - the entire imperial period of the western Roman Empire is during the "Civilization" period.
And yes, when our Culture/Civilization collapses, it seems very likely that one of China/India/Russia/some other Culture will have the most material power.