Active Entries
- 1: [Open Post] Heathen Open Post
- 2: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on A Short History of Ethics
- 3: Ask Me (Just About) Anything
- 4: A Request: Help with Dream Interpretation
- 5: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Blessing: the Art and the Practice
- 6: Divination Offering - Rune or Ogham Reading Through the End of the Year
- 7: [Main Blog Post] Looking Back on 2024 and Forward to 2025
- 8: [Main Blog Post] How the Cost of Freight Has Shaped the World
- 9: [Main Blog Post] [Heathen Rosary] Draft "Hail Holy Forebears"
- 10: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on Shadow Tech
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2023-05-15 02:58 pm (UTC)2) I think whether you can say primitive people don't have "culture" depends very much on how you're defining that very abstract word. If you mean something like "high culture" or "familiarity with and/or facility with producing elements of a highly developed artistic, intellectual, and/or philosophical tradition" then, sure, folks at a subsistence level are going to have a lot less of that, especially material expressions of that. On the other hand, my cultural anthropology professor defined culture as something like "a society's shared understanding of how the world works" - something that literally every human society has. Generally speaking, I find the anthropological use more often helpful, and prefer to talk about the snobbish use by qualifying it (like I did with "high culture" above).
3) As for energy and culture, that's a good question. Certainly we have far more popular culture than ever before, and it's easier to contribute to it than ever before, thanks in large part to energy-intensive technologies and the lifestyles they enable. On the other hand, everything Apollonian culture ever made was done with muscle, wind, and wood for energy, so it seems like you can get plenty of High Culture without the glut of energy we take for granted.