[Open Post] Heathen Open Post

[jprussell]

Howdy,

So, I'm looking to strengthen some connections among Ecosophia-adjacent Heathens, and an easy first step seemed to be a regular open post here on my dreamwidth.

A few ground rules:

1. The overall goal here is for folks interested in Heathenry to meet, share resources, and so forth. So, even though I won't draw a hard line on "on-topic" against "off-topic," it would be best if posts have something to do with Germanic/Northern European polytheism, whether ancient or modern.


2. Let's keep things civil. Disagreement is welcome, but insults, rudeness, and attacks are not.


3. I don't expect enough traffic to need to put a hard limit on when this post will be open, but once the next open post goes up, please post any new discussions there.

Otherwise, welcome, and kindly say hello!

Comments

[jprussell]

1) Fair enough on Hyperborea and the inconsistencies in the description of Troy's locale. I was mostly going with the celebrated fact that Heinrich Schleimannn used the descriptions in the Iliad to find Hisarlik, which has many points of evidence pointing to its being the historical location of "Troy," at least as described by Homer. Of course, as with some of the examples I cited (like the historical events that got smashed together into the Nibulungenied and associated tales), it's quite plausible that more than one historical event "resonated" with the underlying myth, and they got merged (which fits pretty well with your third point below). One example I've given some thought to is the recurring pattern of the "War Between the Tribes/Functions" in various Indo-European bodies of myth, as especially highlighted by Dumezil in his Tri-Functional hypothesis - the Aesir and Vanir, the Asuras and the Devas, maybe also the two sides in the Mahabharata, the Romans and the Sabines, arguably the Dorian invasion of Greece, and so forth). Various historical-reconstruction-oriented folks have tried to find the "real" event that originated these myths - some going as far back as when the Indo-Europeans formed from two or more disparate groups, others going slightly farther forward, to when the Indo-Europeans started bumping into other established groups, like the "First Farmers" of Europe (referred to in the Ancient DNA literature as the "EEFs" - which I think stands for "Early European Farmers"). On this particular story, I've started to feel that all of the proposed historical antecedents might be "right" - for one reason or another, various Indo-European-derived groups had a story pattern of two groups with different proclivities coming into conflict and then finding some kind of uneasy peace, with a new order that incorporates elements from both. When that pattern played out multiple times historically (which isn't so surprising), each time got identified as when it "really" happened, even if elements from earlier versions got kept. So, according to my view, something like the "Rape of the Sabine Women" likely really did happen among the early Romans, but before that, the Early/Proto-Romans likely had similar stories about some other similar event, and some of those likely got incorporated as details to the story that may or may not have really happened with their Italian neighbors.

2) I was going to say about Baldr slaying Fenrir, then you corrected yourself with the follow-on comment :) That said, Baldr does have a less violent triumphant return - after Ragnarok, He comes back from Hel to rule the reborn world in His father's stead, so all is not lost. As for the Odin-Osiris equivalence, that's quite interesting! That also brings to mind the possibility of Loki as the Set equivalent, for His "dark counterpart" role to Odin and trouble-making ways, if nothing else.

3) Ah, fair enough! I find it easier to be onboard with this way of putting it than my interpretation of what you said before, which is likely a failing of mine. I agree that it's a mistake to view myths as "just" garbled versions of "real" historical events, and am primarily interested in teasing out what "really" happened historically to cast more light on what the myths related to them might mean. To go with my above example about the war between the functions, it's boring (to me) to posit that the Aesir-Vanir war is a dim memory of when the Germans ran into the earlier inhabitants of Scandinavia, or when the Indo-Europeans ran into the EEFs, or when the groups that merged into the Indo-Europeans ran into each other, or whatever. By that view, we get something like "Well, these other folks had a religion with more Goddesses and a greater emphasis on the land and fertility, and the Indo-Europeans/Germans had masculine war Gods, and so the historic Germans ended up with both, due to peacemaking, ethnogenesis, or whatever." It's much more interesting to propose that there is something "above" the material world (astral, mental, spiritual, whatever) with some kind of shape to it that has manifested in various ways in material history, and each of those manifestations might cast a little more light on that pattern by being slightly different.

All of which is a long way to say, it sounds like I agree with you :)

Cheers,
Jeff

[sdi]

Yeah, it sounds like we're in agreement! And, in all fairness to the historical-reconstruction folks you cite, my only real criticism of them is that I think the "real" event is spiritual rather than historical. So I'm trying to track down that "archetypal" Troy, and would not be surprised at all to see the "Trojan War" play out in many times and places over the last few thousand years. Since the "Trojan War" is all about the children of the heroes, my guess is that the myths I've been tracking—Horus, Apollon, Perseus, etc.—are all tied into it somehow, and out of devotion to the gods I'd love to try and understand how, though I despair of actually accomplishing it. (I dearly hope the daimons will be kind enough to explain it all to me once I'm dead, though!)