Active Entries
- 1: [Open Post] Heathen Open Post
- 2: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on A Short History of Ethics
- 3: Ask Me (Just About) Anything
- 4: A Request: Help with Dream Interpretation
- 5: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Blessing: the Art and the Practice
- 6: Divination Offering - Rune or Ogham Reading Through the End of the Year
- 7: [Main Blog Post] Looking Back on 2024 and Forward to 2025
- 8: [Main Blog Post] How the Cost of Freight Has Shaped the World
- 9: [Main Blog Post] [Heathen Rosary] Draft "Hail Holy Forebears"
- 10: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on Shadow Tech
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2024-12-10 04:33 am (UTC)It seems somewhat ridiculous to me to even suggest this, but perhaps we need some kind of framework for very clearly articulating something like "here is a right way to do things, which may even be the right way to do things for certain people in certain contexts (like members of a group with its own practices), but that by no means makes it the only right way for all folks." I have an inkling that a useful way of organizing for Heathens would be borrowing the "Haliggild" concept from the Theodish, where groups that want to practice together form "Holy Guilds" with their own bylaws, practices, rules for who can and can't be members, and so forth, allowing lots of local specificity, but then those guilds can band together in larger affiliative groups (or not!) to get more flexibility at higher levels and avoid things like overly strong dogmatism and ultraorthodoxy. I'm not really in a place to take it much beyond an inkling just yet, though, so it doubtless has all kinds of flaws I haven't considered.
Cheers,
Jeff