Active Entries
- 1: [Open Post] Heathen Open Post
- 2: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on A Short History of Ethics
- 3: Ask Me (Just About) Anything
- 4: A Request: Help with Dream Interpretation
- 5: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Blessing: the Art and the Practice
- 6: Divination Offering - Rune or Ogham Reading Through the End of the Year
- 7: [Main Blog Post] Looking Back on 2024 and Forward to 2025
- 8: [Main Blog Post] How the Cost of Freight Has Shaped the World
- 9: [Main Blog Post] [Heathen Rosary] Draft "Hail Holy Forebears"
- 10: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on Shadow Tech
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2024-11-05 10:05 pm (UTC)There were attempts by some in the Renaissance to really distinguish between "natural" magic (simple alignment of correspondences that produced results) and "spiritual" magic (which involve spirits). This distinction was undertaken likely so as to allow magic to "pass," as it were, in Christian settings, and is less about controlling spirits (a la Goetia) than about the action of magic itself: when you're aligning those correspondences, who are the meditators of the action? After all this time, philosophically I have to say that they are (in my estimation) spirits (daimones), and therefore the disinction is spurious.
I wish you nothing but the best in all your endeavors, and Axé,
Fra' Lupo