Active Entries
- 1: A Request: Help with Dream Interpretation
- 2: [Open Post] Heathen Open Post
- 3: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on A Short History of Ethics
- 4: Ask Me (Just About) Anything
- 5: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Blessing: the Art and the Practice
- 6: Divination Offering - Rune or Ogham Reading Through the End of the Year
- 7: [Main Blog Post] Looking Back on 2024 and Forward to 2025
- 8: [Main Blog Post] How the Cost of Freight Has Shaped the World
- 9: [Main Blog Post] [Heathen Rosary] Draft "Hail Holy Forebears"
- 10: [Main Blog Post] [Book] Thoughts on Shadow Tech
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2023-09-26 05:35 pm (UTC)As for "unchosen binding constraints," hmm, I'm not sure. A single mother who works two jobs to keep her kids fed might not feel she has totally "chosen" all of the binding constraints on her behavior, but I doubt she feels much slack. But maybe she could if she re-conceptualized? I'm not sure. One thing I'm running up against here is that I've read a lot of stuff lately, that I mostly agree with, that the idea that "all unchosen constraints should be removed" might be seen as one way to express the core drive behind the entire liberal current for the past ~300-400 years, and that taking that idea too far might be why we have a lot of the craziness we do in the world - the idea that we shouldn't even be constrained by little things like biology or physics, for example, and should push for a robo-utopia of infinite abundance throughout the stars.
Anyhow, where I currently stand, and might have said more clearly in the post, is that slack is a desirable spiritual/metaphysical quality, but it is not the only desirable spiritual/metaphysical quality, and very likely needs to be balanced against others.