1) That's interesting, I hadn't noticed that, likely since the only mundane astrologer I follow is JMG, and he doesn't much shy away from taboo subjects :)
2) Interesting. In my understanding, the mental activity in the form of models and equations of physicists and those who learn from them would certainly be happening on the astral plane, but ostensibly, the things that their models and equations describe are material plane phenomena. One example off the top of my head is radioactive decay. Something material is happening in the release of energy from certain substances, and the model of half-lives, emitted protons/neutrons, and so forth is our astral way of trying to grasp that something in more detail.
So, are you asserting that the strides in 20th century physics were advances in our perception of/constructs within the astral plane (totally agree), that what 20th century physics describes, like relativity, are actually astral phenomena rather than material (an intriguing suggestion I hadn't considered and so don't know if I agree), or something else?
no subject
1) That's interesting, I hadn't noticed that, likely since the only mundane astrologer I follow is JMG, and he doesn't much shy away from taboo subjects :)
2) Interesting. In my understanding, the mental activity in the form of models and equations of physicists and those who learn from them would certainly be happening on the astral plane, but ostensibly, the things that their models and equations describe are material plane phenomena. One example off the top of my head is radioactive decay. Something material is happening in the release of energy from certain substances, and the model of half-lives, emitted protons/neutrons, and so forth is our astral way of trying to grasp that something in more detail.
So, are you asserting that the strides in 20th century physics were advances in our perception of/constructs within the astral plane (totally agree), that what 20th century physics describes, like relativity, are actually astral phenomena rather than material (an intriguing suggestion I hadn't considered and so don't know if I agree), or something else?
Cheers,
Jeff