k_a_nitz: Modern Capitalism II (Default)
k_a_nitz ([personal profile] k_a_nitz) wrote in [personal profile] jprussell 2024-03-25 11:34 pm (UTC)

The line between self-harm and taking risks is to my mind a reflection of the probabilities. Self-harm is 100% probable once committed, but volunteering for something with a positive chance of no harm is something quite different, and I think you are right in seeing them differently. I think there is a good reason that self-harm is seen as a negative or out of the ordinary (ie those 19C Russian Christians who flogged themselves) in many cultures. Where it gets interesting is when the harm is low level - i.e. tattooing (or does the shift in its acceptability reflect a shift in the acceptability of self-harm?). What distinguishes tattooing from branding except a pain threshold and cultural mores (or historical use)?

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting